| M.A. PROGRAMS IN PHILOSOPHY |
|
|
| Who should
consider an M.A. program in philosophy? Three categories of students who ultimately want
to get a Ph.D. and pursue an academic career might benefit from such programs: (i)
students whose undergraduate major was not philosophy; (ii) students who majored in
philosophy at universities with philosophy departments outside the analytic mainstream;
and (iii) students who majored in philosophy, have a solid grounding in the various areas
of philosophy, but who studied philosophy at smaller colleges and universities, or at
institutions with weak academic reputations (students should consult their departments to
find out whether graduates of their schools have been able to gain admittance to Ph.D.
programs of their choice). Students in each category may be both qualified and able to get
into the Ph.D. programs of their choice; but students who fit into one of these categories
may be more likely to have trouble getting into Ph.D. programs and may be good candidates
to benefit from M.A. programs. A good M.A.
program will provide many benefits: it will allow a student to get a basic grounding in
philosophy or expand the breadth of her existing knowledge; to develop increased
familiarity with current debates in philosophy; to prepare and polish written work in
philosophy that will be useful in the applications process for Ph.D. programs; and to get
to know some established philosophers who can then provide meaningful letters of
recommendation for Ph.D. programs.
Of programs that offer the M.A. as the highest
graduate degree, the top ten programs (in terms of faculty quality) are:
|
Group 1 (1) |
Representative
Faculty |
| 1. |
Tufts
University |
Norman
Daniels, Daniel Dennett, Mark Richard, Stephen White |
|
|
|
|
Group 2
(2-10) |
|
| 2. |
Arizona
State University |
Brad
Armendt, Stewart Cohen, Jeffrie Murphy, Michael White |
| 2. |
University
of Wisconsin, Milwaukee |
Margaret
Atherton, Mark Kaplan, William Wainwright, Joan Weiner |
| 2. |
Virginia
Polytechnic Institute & State University |
Roger
Ariew, Richard Burian, Valerie Hardcastle, Deborah Mayo |
| 5. |
Northern
Illinois University |
Harold
Brown, Michael Gelven, Tomis Kapitan, William Tolhurst |
| 5. |
Texas
A&M University |
Colin
Allen, Jonathan Kvanvig, Hugh McCann, Robin Smith |
| 5. |
University
of Houston |
Gregory
Brown, Cynthia Freeland, Justin Leiber, William Nelson |
| 5. |
University
of Missouri, St. Louis |
Lawrence
Davis, Robert Gordon, Paul Roth, Stephanie Ross |
| 9. |
Georgia
State University |
Robert
Almeder, Robert Arrington, David Blumenfeld, Kit Wellman |
| 9. |
Western
Michigan University |
Sylvia
Culp, Arthur Falk, Michael Pritchard, Quentin Smith |
|
Tufts, Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and Northern Illinois have the longest established programs;
the above ranking is based only on faculty quality. Let me emphasize, too, that all
these programs boast strong faculties, and would be excellent choices for M.A. study. Of
the several dozen schools that offer a terminal M.A., these schools have the best
(largely) "analytic" faculties with strengths in the "core" areas
and/or moral/political philosophy and/or history of philosophy. Other M.A. programs not
noted here do have particular strengths, like University of Colorado at Denver in
Continental philosophy, and Colorado State University in applied ethics. But the programs
ranked here generally have faculties that compare favorably with existing PhD programs;
indeed, the schools ranked 1-8 are probably stronger than any non-ranked PhD program in
terms of faculty quality. Students should, however, investigate the success of all MA
programs in placing their students in top Ph.D. programs.Many Ph.D. programs also admit M.A. students. Students
should be more wary of the M.A. programs at schools in roughly the top 25 that grant the
PhD: often M.A. students take a back seat to the Ph.D. students (in terms of faculty
attention), and students with weak philosophy backgrounds may find the pace and level of
seminars geared to Ph.D. students daunting. Students considering M.A. programs in
top-ranked Ph.D.-granting institutions should investigate the situation of M.A. students
at the school carefully before enrolling. However, some PhD programs that are less highly
ranked, but still have strong faculties, may in fact turn out to be good choices for the
MA. |
|